Javascript is either disabled or not supported by this browser. This page may not appear properly.
History 203
Dimensions of History
Roger Williams University
Fall, Semester, 2001
Michael R. H. Swanson, Ph. D.
Office:  Feinstein 111
Hours:  M, T, Th, F  9:00-10:00
Phone 401 254 3230
Week of September 11
After the Fact:  The Art of Historical Detection
James Davidson and Mark Lytle
New York:  McGraw-Hill, 2000
Assignments for the week of September 25, 2001
Click for Printable Version
For Tuesday, September 25

    Read, in Davidson,

         Chapter 1: Serving Time in Virginia, pp. 1-22.

    There are at least three theoretical concerns which form the central focus of this chapter. First is the question of historical reconstruction. How can a historian accurately reconstruct what happened in a place as removed in time and circumstance as Jamestown is. This reminds us of some of the points Schlabach made in the essay I assigned last week. Among the problems are understanding and trusting the documents we read. What tests does Davidson recommend in considering the record left by John Smith. (If you're a sports fan, the baseball report is pretty hilarious).

    Second, consider the question of point of view. (I'll abbreviate that as POV from now on). What are the limits on the POV of contemporary accounts?  Can we generalize this limitation to extend to other historical circumstances?

    What are the advantages of substitution our POV in place of that of those contemporary to the event under study? What are the disadvantages? What is the difference between the POV of the "man on the street" and the POV of academics like ourselves? How can we borrow from other disciplines like Sociology?

    The topic to which these theoretical concerns are addressed is the labor problem and the death rate in Jamestown during the first fifty to sixty years of settlement. Try to follow the train of questions as the authors try to reconstruct what may have happened.
Click for Sample Questions for Rutherfurd Quiz One
For Thursday, September 27

    Read, in Davidson,

         Chapter 2: The Visible and Invisible Worlds of Salem, pp. 23-47

    If understanding the situation in Jamestown is complicated by the lack of reliable first hand information, perhaps the opposite problem exists in considering witchcraft in Salem. In Jamestown, the subject is vast and the information slim, in Salem, the area is small (a single village) and the record vast. We have a fairly thorough account of what happened, and a many competing explanations of why it happened. POV is plural not singular, and when historians rely on insights from contemporary scholarly disciplines they have many from which to choose. As you read this essay, be aware of how many different disciplines are used, why we seek to use them in our day and age (the Puritans "knew" what was happening, didn't they?). Note, too, that the end result is a reaffirmation of the concept of multiple causes... something which Schlabach emphasized in our prior readings.


Diary of Internet Research.

    Now I want you to begin keeping a serious record of the research you are doing. For each reading assignment select a sampling of persons, places, and things, and extend your investigation beyond the materials Davidson provides. We've done a little work on this in class, (remember the grid, with primary, secondary, and visual columns) Using a variety of search engines, seek to find as much as you can. BOOKMARK what you find, and store the URLs on one of the free Internet sites. Also write them down. (An easy way for you to do this is to have your word processor and browser running simultaneously and copy and paste from one into the other).

      We may not finish Chapter 2 in Davidson, but I want you to do the preliminary work regardless of how far we get in Chapter 1.
Week of October 2 - 4
Week of October 9 - 11