Jim Camden

History 203.01

Prof. Swanson

12 – 20 – 01

The Great Revolt of 1381

One of the greatest thinkers of the Fifteenth Century, Machiavelli, believes that a country must have social classes in order for the republic to be successful (Discourses on Livy, 28-29). It is good for uprisings to occur within a country because when people rebel within their own nation it means that they are progressing forward, bettering their situation in life. The civil rights’ movement in the United States during the 1960’s, the English Civil War, and the Storming of the Bastille Tower are all examples of successful revolts that helped better the lives of those who wanted change. The Great Peasant Revolt of 1381 was another uprising, by those belonging to the lower classes of Great Britain, which tried to bring about change for the better.

When King Richard II took over in England from the command of Edward II, the people of England were very dissatisfied with the way Parliament handled the outcome of the French war. The war had created a financial crisis and the government resorted to collecting three poll taxes between the years 1377 and 1381 to help pay for the cost of the war. The Poll Tax of 1381 was the main reason given as to why the men and women of London had risen up against the King of England, Richard II. This one revolt of 1381 turned out to be the largest and most serious outbreak of popular unrest in England during the Middle Ages.

What was surprising about this revolt was the fact that it started in the Southeast part of London, and continued to sweep northward, through the whole country of England. The reason that this part of the early stages was surprising was because 90% of all the peasants who made up the region consisted of tenant framers. Manorial records, official records kept throughout history of England, from the southeastern sections of London showed that the tenant farmers were being offered short term leases on their lands instead of long term contracts on their farms. 

The Poll Tax of 1381 was the third Poll Tax in four years. It was brought into effect so that the officials in England could have finances to help support the battles with France and Spain. The tax was a payment of one schilling by a person over the age of fifteen to the local government.. Although there was a vague stipulation that the rich ought to help out the poor and pay the tax, no provision was made for grading and the rate was pushed higher.

 

The Manorial records also showed who did and did not pay the tax. The original plan was to pay 2/3’s by January 1381, then collect the remaining 1/3 of it by June. Government officials were in need of money and were growing impatient with waiting for the money that was coming in slowly. So, the collectors were told to go out and charge the whole tax at once and return to the offices with all the money by the 22nd of April. While the collectors were gathering money, a new committee was being set up by the government to make inquiries about certain counties. Rumors were then started that a brand new tax was about to be implemented without Parliament’s authority.Since social, political and religious orthodoxies were challenged, and heresies became the basis for the mass movement, ill feelings were now forced upon officials.

Wat Tyler was considered to be the main leader of the rebellion. Not much else is known about his life; however, some believe that he might have been a soldier at one time. He was chosen to be the leader on June 7, 1381. He was also a key figure in the freeing of John Ball. Tyler was the man who held meetings with King Richard II to help solve the problems the peasants were facing at this time, such as the Poll Tax, and bringing the people of London, back under control (Encyclopedia Americana).

John Ball was the other leader of the Peasants Revolt in England. Ball was an ex-communicated priest at York who continued to preach in open marketplaces. He was imprisoned for a good majority of his life after 1376. At the start of the Great Revolt, he was rescued by Kentish rebels from prison and accompanied them to London. Once the rebellion was over, he was tried and found guilty in a court. He was sentenced to death and hanged as punishment for his preaching. He preached to others in an attempt to kill all the Lords and high-church officials. 

With the revolt almost immanent, government officials were now panicking. King Richard II realized that the Poll Tax was the biggest mistake that he could have made while king. The Poll Tax was seen as too large and unfair for the people of London to contribute. The mistake came at the advice of the persistence of government officials who wanted to collect it. England was still trying to recover financially from the French war, and economically from the “Black Plague” of the 1340’s. 

King Richard II was a young king whom many believed was ill advised by his councilors, Sudbury and Hales. These two were the chief advisors of King Richard II; however, they too were new to the political scene. Also, they were unpopular with the country because of what they stood for. “Hales suffered from his association with the Hospitallers, while Sudbury was perceived as the personification of the ‘Caesarean Clergy,’ the clerics were the ones who mingled with the affairs of the church and the realm. 

At the beginning of June in 1381, a group of men attacked the perceptory of the Hospitallers (the order that Hales belonged to). These groups of men met at Bocking and took an oath to “destroy divers lieges of the king and to have no law in England except only those which they themselves moved to be ordained. The reason why the Hospitallers was attacked first was because it was the organization of which Hales (the founder of the Poll Tax) stood for. Then on June 11th the King asked for the reason they attacked. The rebels’ response was that it was to help stop the king from receiving treacherous advice.

On June 12th the rebels from Kent joined with those from Essex and met up at the Black Health. The rebels set up a meeting with the King to discuss their arguments about the advice given to him by his councilors. That, however, fell through and no meeting took place. The rebels marched into London and were met with open arms by other peasants who were already destroying the city. A second attempt was made to meet with the king in the Tower of London, but the king did not meet because he could not make the remaining peasants leave the tower. The following day the King and his councils met up with Wat Tyler to hear for the first time the demands presented by the opposing side. The King pretended to agree with the demands. Right after this meeting, the rebels, who continued to occupy “The Tower,” beheaded Sudbury, Hales and a Franciscan Friar.

On the following day Wat Tyler met up with the King and officials to discuss, for the second time, the peasants’ demands at Smithfield. Shortly after the meeting, The Mayor of London killed Tyler and the rebel army was sent home. The reason why the rebels of the Essex and Kentish counties placed so much pressure on the King was so that they could get satisfaction on their demands. Due to the uprisings that took place in London, many other small independent rebellions occurred throughout the entire country. The main rebellion was located in East Anglia, at the Home Counties and with the support of the poor, continued to thrive. 

Also, a number of internal troubles occurred within the provincial towns, where law and order broke down within its own system of government. In late June and early July, riots broke out at Scarborough and Beverly in Yorkshire, at Winchester in Hampshire and at Northampton. There were some uprisings within the small towns that took place during the time frame of the Peasants Revolt.Even though they occurred before and after the revolt, they should, in no way, be considered part of the actual “Great Peasants Revolt.”

Although a lot of activity took place during this revolt and many different people became involved the events, the revolt did not actually gain anything it had set out to accomplish. The aristocracy supported by the merchants was too great to have been taken over by a community of peasants. Even though they did not overthrow the monarchialgovernment, they did raise awareness of the struggle between the peasants and Lords. There were periods during the Middle Ages where rent on houses declined, but that could have been attributed to other aspects of society (i.e. population, economy, agriculture) during that particular time and not the revolt that took place.

The Great Peasant Revolt was an uprising in which the citizens wanted to change the social status within England. Even though they tried to make things better for themselves, their battle did not succeed, as they would have liked. With the help of the Merchants, the Monarchial government was able to keep the peasants down and keep social classes in England. Even though the peasant class did not overthrow the government, they did, however, manage to raise awareness to the conditions in which they lived.